By Tom Collins
This post has been rattling around in my head since I got to "meet" BlogPaws 2010 speaker Edie Jarolim and ran across her post, Health Insurance for Pets? Hell, Yes!
And, so I don't get in trouble with our speaker from the FTC, Mary K. Engle, please note that Yvonne and I have a paying gig working with BlogPaws sponsor PurinaCare Pet Health Insurance on their blog.
Now, Edie compellingly made the case for why you should get health insurance for your pet — and especially why you should start it when the pet is young and healthy. In her follow-up post, she and guest author Susanne Fritz added guidance on what to look for in a policy (and what to "look out" for).
The part that's been bugging me is the argument I've seen in several places (e.g., MSN Money; Dollarish) that pet health insurance is a bad "investment," claiming you'd be better off putting the monthly premium into a savings account.
My reaction: DU-U-U-U-U-H!!!
Health insurance is NOT an investment! It's protection against financial disaster. That includes pet health insurance.
What finally prompted me to spill this out of my head and onto the blog was the excellent collection of pet industry stats and financial info recently posted by Ellie Nelson over at the Pet Insurance Center blog, with the very relevant title, Who Ate My Money? U.S. Pet Industry Expenditures. Here's one of the charts, showing a breakdown of how much the average dog and cat owner spends annually: 
If you add the Surgical Vet Visits and "Routine Vet" lines together, the AVERAGE pet owner is spending well over $500 per year on veterinary care.
But again, pet health insurance is not about these ordinary, average expenses. It's about protecting yourself and your pet from the financial (and emotional ... and life-threatening) disasters that may not happen, but all too often do.
What kind of disaster are we talking about? Well, remember Edie's vet bill in her post was an unexpected $743. We've done a series of "From the Claims Files" podcasts on the PurinaCare blog (scroll down a couple of posts) describing everything from major surgeries for accidents and swallowing strange objects, to high-tech diagnostics, to treatments for chronic or herediary conditions, where the bills ran $2,000-$4,000. Deb Mallon over at Pet-Care-Unleashed provides a meticulous comparison of four years of her dog's life with or without pet insurance, including a serious injury that cost $5,600. Even the MSN Money post linked above acknowledged advances in veterinary medicine with "costs ranging from $1,000 to more than $5,000."
The "mother of all claims" that I've seen so far is described by another of our speakers, Dr. Larry McDaniel, in his recent Now That's a Vet Bill! post: seemingly routine spay surgery and then complex treatment for post-surgical complications, totaling over $18,000. PurinaCare reimbursed over $14,000.
Okay, to paraphrase Dr. Larry at the end of his post, "That's what pet health insurance is REALLY all about!" Imagine how it must have felt to those pet parents to take their beloved dog in for a routine procedure, have all that go wrong, and then be able to make it all right again — without worrying about going bankrupt.
And getting back to my original point, even if you accepted the "investment" premise, there are at least two huge holes in the savings-are-better argument.
The first is that hardly anyone has the financial self-discipline to put the amount of a pet health insurance premium into a savings account each month. Heck, Americans can't bring themselves to save for retirement, or their kids' college, or other kinds of "rainy days." What makes these financial advice gurus think anyone is going to set up a separate account for their pets' health care needs?
The second flaw in their logic is far worse. Even if you had the discipline to put away that relatively small amount as an "investment" it would take years to accumulate enough to cover even the amount of Edie's vet bill. Your "investment" would never grow enough to make a dent in the bill Dr. Larry wrote about, within the life span of most dogs and cats.
I got a free quote for a PurinaCare With Preventive Care policy on the mixed breed puppy we will be getting as soon as our cat is fully settled in here in Colorado. I chose a $500 deductable, becasue the "average" above tells me we'll spend that much every year anyway, so if we have a claim for something unusual, it'll likely be covered. The premium will be $26.36 per month.
According to the Simple Savings Calculator over at BankRate.com, here's what I could accumulate if intead I put that amount into a savings account, added the same amount every month for the next 15 years, and earned 5% interest (yeah, right!): 
How much protection would our dog have in the first few months? The first couple of years?
As you can see, it would be more than two years before I'd have enough to cover a bill like the one Edie posted on her blog. I'd have to hope nothing went wrong for 8 years, to be ready for a bill like the many we've talked about in the PurinaCare podcasts. And if a real disaster like the one Dr. Larry described came along, a savings account would never provide much comfort.
On top of that, what if you actually needed to spend the money in the account on vet bills along the way? You'd have to start the savings process all over. And you'd go back to having no protection for your pet's health at all for the first few years!
So in my opinion, when you think about pet health insurance, be thinking about your pet's health and not about investment returns.
You're buying protection against a disaster you hope will never happen and the peace of mind you'll have in knowing that, if it does, your pets' health — or even survival — will not depend on how big your savings account has gotten.







Great article. I appreciate your comment that "Health insurance is NOT an investment! It's protection against financial disaster. That includes pet health insurance". So many pet owners can't seem to understand this concept that pet insurance is just that- insurance!
Posted by: Stacy | 03/16/2010 at 03:34 PM
Thanks for the extended shout out, Tom, and for all those statistics you provide to back up my contention that pet insurance makes more sense than the much vaunted -- but rarely used -- pet savings account.
Looking forward to our actual meeting at BlogPaws!
Posted by: WillMyDogHateMe | 03/16/2010 at 04:56 PM
Great post Tom! People can always make an argument about pet insurance not "paying for itself" over time but you hit it right on the head. It isn't an investment at all, its protection. To me, I didn't want to ever make a decision on my doggies health based upon finances. Those are just two things I don't want to cross paths. Its funny because that's coming from a chick who never sees the doctor because of the money but should. :)
Thanks for the mention on our graphic as well! :) Keep in touch and hopefully one of us can make it to blogpaws!
Posted by: Ellie | 03/16/2010 at 06:46 PM
Great post! Love your research and the way you put it. I'm tweeting :) I so agree with everything.
Twink!
Posted by: Twinkie | 03/17/2010 at 11:53 AM
Thank you for breaking this down. However, it does not take into account the fact that some breeds, such as the Wheaten Terrier, are no longer covered after the age of 6, at least by one insurance company that I am aware of. Then what is the pet parent to do?
Amelia
Your Pets View
Posted by: Amelia | 03/26/2010 at 01:40 PM
Many pet lovers now a days are planning for pet insurance which shows their care towards their pets. There are many advantages of pet insurance, top reasons to go in for pet insurance are Bears the cost of medical expenses, Insuring multiple pets and many more.
Posted by: Pet Insurance | 03/31/2010 at 04:30 AM
Hi Stacy, Ellie, Twinkie, and Pet Insurance 101: Glad you found the post helpful and thanks for the kind words!
Edie: No, thank YOU, for putting yourself out there as an example and inspiring the rest of us to THINK about what having a pet get sick or hurt really means. Can't wait to meet you at BlogPaws!
Amelia: I'm not sure what company you looked at, but I'm pretty sure there are no exclusions by breed or age for PurinaCare policies. If you get coverage right from puppy-hood and keep it in force continuously, then you don't even have to worry about most "pre-existing" conditions.
I just went to the free quote page and put in a Wheaten Terrier born 10 years ago and it gave me a quote. Here's the link to their page where the coverage page:
http://www.purinacare.com/plan_overview.aspx#tab-cont2
But just to be sure, I'd recommend calling their toll-free number (877-878-7462) and ask about your specific question.
Posted by: twitter.com/Tom_Collins | 04/01/2010 at 02:38 PM
Many pet lovers now a days are planning for pet insurance which shows their care towards their pets. There are many advantages of pet insurance, top reasons to go in for pet insurance are Bears the cost of medical expenses, Insuring multiple pets and many more.
Posted by: Pet Insurance | 04/09/2010 at 03:45 AM
thanks a lot Tom! i have 8 dogs at my house and it was very important info for me :)
Posted by: daisy | 04/25/2010 at 06:48 AM
Great information. I encourage any pet owner to seek some type of pet insurance, regardless of who you buy it from. We've been unlucky lately and had several emergency trips to the vet in the last two weeks. I would do it all over again if I had to but these 2 trips cost me well over 800.00 in vet bills. Enough said.
Keep up the great posts.
Posted by: Brian | 06/18/2010 at 12:54 AM
To show love and care for pets many pet owners plans for pet insurance. This is something new for me. Last week I wonder whether my cat or dog should be given first. On the first place I really love them both. I'm just really worried because I'm always away from home. I'm planning to take a leave vacation to process the certificates next month.
Posted by: pet health insurance | 12/27/2010 at 07:40 PM
Thanks for the interesting article and for making a new trend.http://www.vivamagonline.com/index.php Pets insurance is a best idea to keep our pets safe. Congrates and go ahead...Well done and thanks for the info!!
Posted by: Pets insurance | 01/20/2011 at 02:30 AM
Great post! Love your research and the way you put it. There are many advantages of pet insurance, top reasons to go in for pet insurance are Bears the cost of medical expenses, Insuring multiple pets and many more.
Posted by: health insurance | 01/27/2011 at 03:29 AM
Your research is quite good. I like it.
Posted by: Pet Insurance | 08/24/2011 at 06:24 AM
I also think that pet insurance is really essential. Thanks for the nice info!
Posted by: removal services London | 10/10/2011 at 12:53 PM
Hello, This is very great thing you have shared with us.Now I found enough resources by your tips about this issue, Thank you
Posted by: Pharma Exporters | 01/10/2012 at 01:45 AM
Pet insurance is a great way to make sure that you can always provide care for your Pet regardless of the cost. A smart investment.
Posted by: Animals Away | 01/10/2012 at 01:19 PM